All investing involves risk, including loss of principal. There is no guarantee the investment process will lead to profits. Past performance of any security or strategy is no guarantee or indication of future results or performance. Market conditions change continuously.
Securities offered by Registered Representatives through Private Client Services. Member FINRA / SIPC. Advisory services offered by Investment Advisory Representatives of RFG Advisory, LLC (“RFG Advisory” or “RFG”), a registered investment advisor. Private Client Services and RFG Advisory are unaffiliated entities. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where RFG Advisory and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. No advisory services may be rendered by RFG Advisory unless a client agreement is in place.
RFG Advisory is an SEC-registered investment adviser. SEC registration does not constitute an endorsement of RFG by the Commission, nor does it indicate that RFG or any associated investment advisory representative has attained a particular level of skill or ability.
RFG Advisory Part 3, Form CRS, RFG Advisory Form ADV, Part 2A, Investment Advisor Public Disclosure, RFG Advisory Privacy Policy.
The Registered Representative(s) of PCS referenced on this website may only conduct securities business in the states in which they are currently registered. For a list of a Registered Representative’s current registered states, please visit FINRA’s BrokerCheck.
Insurance products and services are offered through a number of insurance providers, including RFG Solutions LLC, an affiliated company of RFG Advisory.
Site Design by ProperExpression
The 60/40 Debate: Rick Wedell’s Take
Recent industry headlines have questioned whether the traditional 60/40 portfolio still makes sense for investors. In this week’s Market Commentary, Rick Wedell, CIO of RFG Advisory, pushes back on that narrative and explains why sweeping allocation shifts can introduce risks for long-term investors.
Rick addresses the growing discussion around moving portfolios toward a 40/60 allocation and why these arguments can unintentionally promote market timing behavior. While markets may appear expensive at times, history shows that valuation alone rarely drives market selloffs.
Instead, meaningful declines tend to occur when unexpected catalysts can disrupt investors’ expectations. Without that catalyst, markets can remain elevated or continue advancing for extended periods.
Rick’s perspective highlights the importance of maintaining disciplined portfolio allocations rather than reacting to headlines or shifting strategies based on short-term narratives.
Topics Covered
• The debate around abandoning the traditional 60/40 portfolio
• Why large allocation changes can encourage market timing
• Evidence showing frequent portfolio adjustments can hurt returns
• The difference between valuations and true market catalysts
• A real-world example of markets remaining strong despite high valuations
• Why disciplined portfolio allocation remains essential for investors